Communication
Theoretical aspects of verbal and non-verbal communication
The interlocutor is influenced by: |
Verbal communication |
|
7% |
Non-verbal communication |
|
93% |
If what we want to say is 100:
- what we say is 70
- what is heard is 40
- what is perceived is 20
- what is remembered is 10
Communication is the main relationship tool humans have at their disposal to create and maintain interaction with their fellow humans.
COMMUNICATION = BRINGING TOGETHER
|
|
|
|
TRANSFER OF INFORMATION
|
|
ESTABLISHING RELATIONS
|
|
Human communication relies on the simultaneous use of different channels
|
|
|
|
VERBAL
|
|
NON-VERBAL
|
Language is closely intertwined with aspects of non-verbal communication
Not everything can be adequately expressed with words
Non-verbal communication
It is what is known as body language and is manifested whenever one person conveys information to another through looks, gestures, voice, using one or more non-verbal indicators at the same time
"Non-verbal communication allows deep content to filter through and speaks as language cannot speak".
(G. Gulotta, 1991)
NON-VERBAL SIGNALS |
|
- are very common
- inherent in communication
- it is not always easy to recognise their meaning and be aware of them
|
|
Non-verbal behaviour
Example
A manager says to an employee: "prepare me a written report of the work you have done in the last month".
The employee replies: "I'll do it now!" ....... and simultaneously nods his head
|
|
|
|
|
The employee nods in addition to saying "yes" with verbal language
|
|
|
REPETITION |
|
Non-verbal often improves the level of accuracy of the message
|
The Axioms of Communication
Watzlawick, Beavin and Jackson, postulated the existence of certain fundamental properties of human communication.
These properties are called ASSIOMS by the authors, they are taken as the basis for the construction of subsequent theories and do not require demonstration but are assumed to be true.
|
|
1st Axiom
ONE CANNOT NOT COMMUNICATE
Any behaviour - words, silences, activity or inactivity - has message value and influences other interlocutors who cannot fail to respond to these communications
|
|
2nd Axiom
ALL COMMUNICATION HAS A CONTENT ASPECT AND A RELATIONSHIP ASPECT, SO THAT THE LATTER CLASSIFIES THE FORMER, AND IS THEREFORE METACOMMUNICATION.
This means that the content of a message must be interpreted in the light of the relationship existing between the interacting parties
|
|
3rd Axiom
THE NATURE OF A RELATIONSHIP DEPENDS ON THE PUNCTUATION OF THE SEQUENCES OF COMMUNICATION BETWEEN COMMUNICANTS
Our communicative exchanges are not random, an uninterrupted sequence of exchanges is organised by introducing real punctuation.
|
|
By observing the conversation between two communicants, one can identify the sequence of who is speaking and who is responding, and one can define what is the cause of a behaviour and what is the effect.
|
|
The ways of punctuating a sequence of events are subjective and can generate relationship conflicts that are sometimes difficult to overcome.
|
4th Axiom
HUMAN BEINGS COMMUNICATE WITH BOTH THE NUMERIC AND THE ANALOGUE CODE |
|
Numerical language
|
Analogue language
|
Communicating involves the ability to combine these two languages, as well as to translate from one to the other the messages to be transmitted and those received
In both cases it can be difficult to translate these and mistakes can be made in interpretation
|
Numerical language
- It concerns the use of words, i.e. arbitrary signs due to a convention on the meaning attributed to them
- It is inclusive of an extremely effective complex logical syntax and it is the preferred tool
- Instrument for conveying content, however, it lacks a number of important meanings for relationship
THE WORD ITSELF ONLY EXPRESSES ITS OWN MEANING
|
Analogue language
- consists of the modes of non-verbal communication
- gestures, facial expressions, voice inflections, the sequence, rhythm and cadence of words, etc., which serve above all to convey aspects concerning the relationship between the participants
|
|
5th Axiom
ALL COMMUNICATIVE EXCHANGES ARE SYMMETRICAL OR COMPLEMENTARY, DEPENDING ON WHETHER THEY ARE BASED ON EQUALITY OR DIFFERENCE
|
|
SIMMETRIC INTERACTION
|
COMPLEMENTARY INTERACTION
|
SIMMETRIC INTERACTION
- it is based on equality
- it occurs when the behaviour of one member tends to mirror that of the other
- it refers to exchanges in which the interlocutors consider themselves to be on the same level: this is the case of communication between equals (husband/wife, classmates, siblings, friends...).
|
|
COMPLEMENTARY INTERACTION
- it is characterised by the difference in position assumed by the persons between whom the communicative exchange takes place
- sometimes it is the socio-cultural context that establishes relationships of this kind (e.g. doctor-patient, teacher-pupil relationships...)
- these are the communicative exchanges in which the communicants are not on the same level (mother/child, employee/employer)
|
Communication styles
Communication styles: Assertive, passive and aggressive
Styles classification
|
|
Passive style
|
Aggressive style
|
Assertive style
|
Message
|
You are right, it doesn't matter what I think
|
I am right, if you do not think the same way you are wrong
|
This is how I see the situation and this is what I think
|
Aim
|
Avoid conflict
|
Getting what you want, winning
|
Communication and mutual respect
|
Voice
|
Sometimes tremulous, flat and monotone, low volume
|
Very firm, often sarcastic and cold tone, prevalence of high tones
|
Expressive, clear and calm, intermediate tone
|
Speech
|
Hesitant and full of pauses, sudden changes in speed, frequent throat clearing
|
Fluent, unhesitating, full of guilt-ridden words, often impetuous
|
Fluent, without hesitation, the emphasis is on the important points of the dialogue, without sudden changes
|
Facial expressions
|
Smiles in the face of criticism, often irrelevant to the content of the conversation
|
The jaws are kept closed and rigid, the smile is often a sneer, the face is shifted forward towards the interlocutor
|
Smiles in the presence of positive events, anger is visibly expressed, jaws are relaxed
|
Visual contact
|
Evasive and irregular, oriented downwards
|
Dominant, from top to bottom
|
Steady but not dominant
|
Body movements
|
Often sits on the edge of a chair, covers its mouth with its hand, keeps an excessive distance from the interlocutor
|
Use of the index finger to point at the interlocutor, body projected towards the other, continuous movements, getting too close to the interlocutor
|
Open and inviting hand movements, relaxed posture, adequate distance to the interlocutor
|
Features of the verbal message
|
Passive style
|
Long and repetitive statements
|
Constant offer of apologies
|
Use of sentences that minimise one's own needs
|
Use of filler words, such as 'MAYBE'
|
Frequent use of statements such as 'SHOULD'.
|
Self-pitying phrases such as 'I FEEL SO DOWN'
|
Frequent justifications
|
Few statements beginning with the pronoun 'I'
|
|
Aggressive style
|
Excessive use of statements beginning with the pronoun 'I'.
|
Opinions that are passed off as facts
|
Threatening questions or sentences
|
Advice like 'YOU MUST DO THIS'.
|
Inducing guilt in the other
|
Use of sarcastic or demeaning sentences
|
Assertive style
|
Concise, clear and content-appropriate statements
|
Use of sentences beginning with the pronoun 'I', or 'I would like to'
|
Distinction between facts and opinions
|
Suggestions that are neither constraining nor guilt-inducing
|
No imperatives such as 'YOU SHOULD DO THIS'.
|
Constructive criticism without blaming
|
Questions aimed at understanding each other's thoughts and feelings
|
Proposal of strategies to solve problems
|
|
Why do we choose one style over another?
PASSIVE STYLE
- desire to be liked and to be accepted by everyone. It starts from a dysfunctional basic assumption, of having to please everyone all the time
- reluctance to get involved in conflicts for which one does not have the appropriate methods of management
- fear that one's involvement will not produce positive results; this is often accompanied by a sense of low self-efficacy
- apprehension in case one should lose control of oneself and raise the tone more than is permissible
Costs and benefits of passive behaviour
|
Benefits
|
Costs
|
costs are avoided in the short term
|
Conflict cannot be avoided in the long run
|
You get approval and sympathy from others more easily
|
It is not possible to achieve this result always and with everyone. The consequence is to fall into frustration
|
Less responsibility is assumed
|
If the problem lies with the passive person, his disengagement will aggravate the situation
|
Sometimes one is able to control others through blaming messages
|
Manipulating and blaming others only produces enmity and conflict
|
|
One gradually loses self-esteem because one would like to express one's point of view but is unable to overcome inhibitions
|
AGGRESSIVE STYLE
- through the tough and aggressive approach one gets results. One assumes that others are always hostile and it is necessary to attack first
- after attacking someone one feels better. This is true but it is a time-limited benefit, in fact sooner or later the relationship with the other will suffer
- the world is populated by hostile people from whom one has to defend oneself
- one has to give tit-for-tat; it is enough for the other person to have an opinion different from one's own in order to attack them without giving them a chance to express themselves
- When you can't take it any more, an outburst of anger is what you need! This is the least objectionable reaction as long as the attack does not produce mortifying results for both contenders
Costs and benefits of aggresive behaviour |
Benefits
|
Costs
|
You get results in the short term
|
In the long run, signs of growing unbearability emerge, producing enmity, boycotting, etc.
|
There is a feeling of dominance
|
Loss of self-control
|
One sees oneself as strong and valued
|
Unnecessary and dangerous guilt is created
|
The assertive style for inclusion
Characteristics of the assertive message
- the assertive message is direct, it is appropriate to replace indirect and manipulative phraseology with an immediate mode of expression, mainly using the pronoun 'I' . The expression "many think that..." becomes "I think that...".
- the assertive message is honest, expressing unambiguously what the person thinks or feels. If I disagreed with my interlocutor I would say "on some topics I disagree with you because...".
- the assertive message is consistent, what is stated verbally corresponds to the body language. If the verbal message contains words spoken in a calm and serene manner, the body will express itself in a similar way
Constructive and destructive criticism
|
DESTRUCTIVE CRITICISM
|
CONSTRUCTIVE CRITICISM
|
It is aimed at the person, who is labelled negatively
|
It is addressed to the performance or behaviour of the person
|
It is inaccurate
|
It is accurate
|
It aims at blaming the person
|
Aims to improve performance and/or behaviour
|
Prone to close the dialogue
|
Keeping the dialogue open
|
Knowing how to say no
- The empathic 'no' is based on one of the basic principles of the assertive message: empathy. It is the least aggressive way to reject unwelcome requests. E.g. we can decline a friend's invitation to dinner by saying "thank you for the invitation, I am very pleased to receive it but I cannot come because I have urgent work to do...".
- the reasoned 'no' is declining the invitation by clearly stating the reasons for the refusal. If the reasons are not an excuse, the message is honest even if not empathetic. E.g. if we are invited to play poker we can decline the invitation by saying "no thanks I don't like playing cards!"
- the manipulative and seductive 'no' is a technique used to 'play hard to get' or to elicit new demands from others. To identify such a message it is often sufficient to pay attention to the meta-verbal and proxemic messages
- the blunt and unquestionable 'no' in this case is not followed by an explanation of any kind, let alone by messages of an empathetic nature. It is just no! The assertive individual seldom uses this mode of expression, because it tends to provoke an aggressive or otherwise negative reaction in the other person.
|