Stary-up promotion for entrepreneurial resilience
Unit 1 Popular understanding and common misconceptions about entrepreneurship
Entrepreneurship has many understandings and they may differ with age, gender and culture. It is commonly equated with self-employment or business creation whereby an individual or a group of individuals establish a new firm. Also, news and official data on entrepreneurship base their stories and claims on the numbers of new enterprises created in the given time period. However, the truth is that not all new businesses are entrepreneurial and not all entrepreneurial endeavours take a form of a new venture.
On the other hand, glorified accounts of entrepreneurship by popular media have been numerous. These often portray entrepreneurship as revolutionary and ground breaking giving examples of Richard Branson, Apple, Tesla, Skype, Amazon, eBay, Netflix etc. However, entrepreneurship does not need to take a form of a revolutionary product.
Other popular misconceptions include:
What is entrepreneurship?
Entrepreneurship is of interest to many audiences and disciplines such as economics, sociology, psychology, anthropology, politicians, governments, media and the society. This is because entrepreneurship creates wealth and development. This wide-ranging relevance poses difficulties in devising a single definition that would fit across all fields and disciplines. The definition adopted by the European Commission takes a broad view of entrepreneurship;
“Entrepreneurship is when you act upon opportunities and ideas and transform them into value for others. The value that is created can be financial, cultural, or social.”[1]
This definition challenges most of the common misconceptions and explains many disagreements existing within current entrepreneurship discourse. The declaration that it is about creating financial, cultural or social value for others has wide reaching consequences. It does not confine entrepreneurship to profit oriented activity. It is also inclusive of artists and social entrepreneurs and those who are not self-employed.
Other important things to remember about entrepreneurship:
[1] Moberg and Stenberg, 2012, p.14 Types of entrepreneurship
We can distinguish between different types of entrepreneurship based on the motivations behind the activity and the goals of the enterprise. They also contribute to the economy and society in different ways bringing social, cultural or economic value.
On the other hand, opportunity entrepreneurship is driven by a choice to exploit a business opportunity. This kind of entrepreneurship is thought to create value, be more innovative and growth oriented. However, it may be that opportunity and necessity co-exist in the sense that an individual may have no better employment option than self-employment but he will choose venture type that creates most value.
Social entrepreneurship pursues primarily pro-social goals seeking to create “social wealth” and bring value to the society rather than focusing on purely on financial wealth. The aim of social entrepreneurship is to address various social needs that are not currently addressed. Social enterprises exist across the non-profit, business and government sectors. What makes them different from charities is that they aim to support at least some of their activity through generating profits, however, they often also depend on government and public support. Examples of social enterprises include Grameen Bank, the Nobel Peace Prize-winning microfinance organization and community development bank founded in Bangladesh. It makes small loans to the poor without requiring a collateral. Other examples include social investment company Acumen, massive open online course (MOOC) providers such as Edx etc Commercial and social entrepreneurship have much in common including emphasis on innovation and necessity to bear risks and to invest.
Academic entrepreneurship often occurs within scientific disciplines such as engineering, biomedical sciences, physics, IT etc. as universities often have accumulated knowledge and technology that enable pursuing highly complex research. However, academic entrepreneurship also occurs across all disciplines including social sciences and humanities. For instance, anthropologists at universities work with large companies to understand motivations and behaviours of their customers. The actors involved in academic enterprises include not only academics and university researchers but also current and former students, private firms and entrepreneurs. Traditionally, academic entrepreneurship was facilitated by university science parks and Technology Transfer Offices but more recently universities are expanding their entrepreneurship facilities to include business incubators, accelerators, networks with industry and alumni etc. (Siegel & Wright 2015).
Why entrepreneurship matters
Entrepreneurship brings multiple benefits by creating value to individuals, societies and to the economy. Here we review more closely how and why entrepreneurship is beneficial.
Entrepreneurship is thought to contribute to development and growth through employment creation, innovation and welfare effects. Small and medium enterprises provide more than two thirds of total employment in private sectors across the EU. However, ambitious entrepreneurs who start a venture with a view of growing it contribute to economic growth more. They are more likely to innovate so that their businesses can expand, earn more and create employment. On the other hand, necessity entrepreneurs do not usually contribute as much to the economy as they are usually engaged in subsistence self-employment.
Generally, entrepreneurs increase choice and variety by providing a diverse range of goods and services to customers’ needs, tastes, preferences and budgets. Through social and cultural entrepreneurship, specific social and cultural products and services are provided directly. These ventures target unmet needs and provide innovations that improve welfare and well-being, make arts and culture more accessible to masses, revitalise and regenerate cities and neighbourhoods. |
definition of entrepreneurship; types of entrepreneurship; start-ups; commercial entrepreneurship; social entrepreneurship; innovation; intrapreneursh
Objectives/goalsUnderstand what entrepreneurship is in a narrow & broad sense
Identify the many different forms of entrepreneurship
Discuss why entrepreneurship matters
EU Entrepreneurial Competencies: Self-awareness and self-efficacy
Entrepreneurial behaviour is at the root of human activity. People’s ideas and creations provide products, services and solutions that organise human activity and make life easier. The common views of entrepreneurship associate it solely with business creation and profit orientation. Yet, entrepreneurs can be found in public and private sphere. Also, not all of them contribute to the economy and the society equally. This training fiche will help you understand what entrepreneurship is. It will discuss different types of entrepreneurship and explain how entrepreneurship is important for the economy and the society. You will also see how and why you should be entrepreneurial without necessarily opening a new business.
· Hunter, M., 2012. On some of the misconceptions about entrepreneurship. Economics, Management and Financial Markets, 7(2), p.55.
· Kearney, C., Hisrich, R.D. and Roche, F., 2009. Public and private sector entrepreneurship: similarities, differences or a combination?. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, 16(1), pp.26-46.
· Lounsbury, M. and Glynn, M.A., 2001. Cultural entrepreneurship: Stories, legitimacy, and the acquisition of resources. Strategic management journal, 22(6?7), pp.545-564.
· OECD 2017. Observatory of Public Sector Innovation. Available at https://www.oecd.org/governance/observatory-public-sector-innovation/home/ · Stam, E., Hartog, C., Van Stel, A. and Thurik, R., 2011. Ambitious entrepreneurship, high-growth firms and macroeconomic growth. The Dynamics of Entrepreneurship: Evidence from Global Entrepreneurship Monitor Data, pp.231-49.
· Trenchard, R., 2016. Be inspired: Five brilliant examples of intrapreneurship in action. Available online at: https://www.virgin.com/entrepreneur/be-inspired-five-brilliant-examples-intrapreneurship-action [last accessed 26 February 2017]
· Trenchard, R., 2016. Top tips for encouraging intrapreneurship in your business. Available online at: https://www.virgin.com/entrepreneur/top-tips-encouraging-intrapreneurship-your-business [last accessed 26 February 2017].
· Anheier, H.K. and Isar, Y.R. eds., 2008. Cultures and globalization: The cultural economy. Sage.
· Antoncic, B. and Hisrich, R.D., 2001. Intrapreneurship: Construct refinement and cross-cultural validation. Journal of business venturing, 16(5), pp.495-527.
· Antoncic, B. and Hisrich, R.D., 2003. Clarifying the intrapreneurship concept. Journal of small business and enterprise development, 10(1), pp.7-24.
· Austin, J., Stevenson, H. and Wei Skillern, J., 2006. Social and commercial entrepreneurship: same, different, or both?. Entrepreneurship theory and practice, 30(1), pp.1-22.
· DiMaggio, P., 1982. Cultural entrepreneurship in nineteenth-century Boston: The creation of an organizational base for high culture in America. Media, Culture and Society, 4(1), pp.33-50.
· DiMaggio, P., 1982. Cultural entrepreneurship in nineteenth-century Boston, part II: The classification and framing of American art. Media, Culture and& Society, 4(4), pp.303-322.
· Estrin, S., Mickiewicz, T. and Stephan, U., 2013. Entrepreneurship, social capital, and institutions: Social and commercial entrepreneurship across nations. Entrepreneurship theory and practice, 37(3), pp.479-504.
· Giacomin, O., Janssen, F., Guyot, J., & Lohest, O. (2011). Opportunity and/or necessity entrepreneurship? The impact of the socio-economic characteristics of entrepreneurs, MPRA Paper 29506.
· Hunter, M., 2012. On some of the misconceptions about entrepreneurship. Economics, Management and Financial Markets, 7(2), p.55.
· Kearney, C., Hisrich, R.D. and Roche, F., 2009. Public and private sector entrepreneurship: similarities, differences or a combination?. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, 16(1), pp.26-46.
· Klamer, A., 2011. Cultural entrepreneurship. The Review of Austrian Economics, 24(2), pp.141-156.
· Klofsten, M. and Jones-Evans, D., 2000. Comparing academic entrepreneurship in Europe–the case of Sweden and Ireland. Small Business Economics, 14(4), pp.299-309.
· Leyden, D.P. and Link, A.N., 2015. Public sector entrepreneurship: US technology and innovation policy. Oxford University Press, USA.
· Lounsbury, M. and Glynn, M.A., 2001. Cultural entrepreneurship: Stories, legitimacy, and the acquisition of resources. Strategic management journal, 22(6?7), pp.545-564.
· Moberg, K., Stenberg, E. and Vestergaard, L., 2012. Impact of entrepreneurship education in Denmark-2012. Odense, Denmark: The Danish Foundation for Entrepreneurship–Young Enterprise.
· Morris, M.H. and Jones, F.F., 1999. Entrepreneurship in established organizations: The case of the public sector. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice, 24(1), pp.71-71.
· OECD 2017. Observatory of Public Sector Innovation. Available at https://www.oecd.org/governance/observatory-public-sector-innovation/home/
· Parker, S.C., 2011. Intrapreneurship or entrepreneurship?. Journal of Business Venturing, 26(1), pp.19-34.
· Pugalis, L., Davidson, J., McLeay, F. and Round, A., 2016. Tough times, difficult choices and public entrepreneurship: Is sponsorship a winning solution?. In New Perspectives on Research, Policy and Practice in Public Entrepreneurship (pp. 37-59). Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
· Rehn, A., Brännback, M., Carsrud, A. and Lindahl, M., 2013. Challenging the myths of entrepreneurship? Entrepreneurship and Regional Development, Vol. 25(7-8), pp. 543-551.
· Scott, M., 2012. Cultural entrepreneurs, cultural entrepreneurship: Music producers mobilising and converting Bourdieu´s alternative capitals. Poetics, 40(3), pp.237-255.
· Siegel, D.S. and Wright, M., 2015. Academic entrepreneurship: time for a rethink?. British Journal of Management, 26(4), pp.582-595.
· Smallbone, D. & Welter, F. (2004). Entrepreneurship in transition economies: Necessity or opportunity driven?, www.babson.edu/entrep/fer/BABSON2003/XXV/XXV-S8/xxv-s8.htm (last accessed 23 April 2010)
· Stam, E., Hartog, C., Van Stel, A. and Thurik, R., 2011. Ambitious entrepreneurship, high-growth firms and macroeconomic growth. The Dynamics of Entrepreneurship: Evidence from Global Entrepreneurship Monitor Data, pp.231-49.
· Stephan, U., Uhlaner, L.M. and Stride, C., 2015. Institutions and social entrepreneurship: The role of institutional voids, institutional support, and institutional configurations. Journal of International Business Studies, 46(3), pp.308-331.
· Swedberg, R., 2006. The cultural entrepreneur and the creative industries: beginning in Vienna. Journal of Cultural Economics, 30(4), pp.243-261.
· Trenchard, R., 2016. Be inspired: Five brilliant examples of intrapreneurship in action. Available online at: https://www.virgin.com/entrepreneur/be-inspired-five-brilliant-examples-intrapreneurship-action [last accessed 26 February 2017]
· Trenchard, R., 2016. Top tips for encouraging intrapreneurship in your business. Available online at: https://www.virgin.com/entrepreneur/top-tips-encouraging-intrapreneurship-your-business [last accessed 26 February 2017].
· Williams, N. and Williams, C.C., 2014. Beyond necessity versus opportunity entrepreneurship: some lessons from English deprived urban neighbourhoods. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 10(1), pp.23-40.